Empedocles Bibliography

http://www.presocratics.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Empedocles.jpg
Andriopoulos, D.Z. “Empedocles’ Theory of Perception’ Platon 24 (1972), pp. 290-98.

Arundel, M. R. (=Wright) “Empedocles fr. 35, 12-15” Classical Review 12 (1962) pp. 109-111.

Babut, D. “Sur l’unité de la pensée d’Empédocle” Philologus 120 (1976), pp. 139-164.

Barnes, H. E. “Unity in the Thought of Empedocles” Classical Journal 63 (1967), pp. 18-23.

Barnes, J. The Presocratic Philosophers 2 vols. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979.

Barnes, J. Review of Wright Empedocles: The Extant Fragments in Classical Review 32 (1982), pp. 191-196.

Bauer, J. B. “Monie. Empedokles B24.4 und 28.3” Hermes 89 (1961), pp. 367-369.

Bergk, T. Commentario de Prooemio Empedoclis. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1839.

Bergk,

T. Kleine Schriften, II. Halle, 1886.

Bicknell, P. J. “The Shape of the Cosmos in Empedocles” Parola del Passato 23 (1968), pp. 118-119.

Bidez, J. La Biographie d’Empédocle. Ghent: Clemm,1894.

Bies, J. Empédocle d’Agrigente. Paris: Villain and Belhomme, 1969.

Bignone, E. Empedocle: Studio Critico. Turin: Bocca, 1916.

Bing, P. “The Voice of Those Who Live in the Sea: Empedocles and Callimachus” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 41 (1981), pp. 33-36.

Blass, F. “Zu Empedokles” Jahrbuch für classisches Philologie 127 (1883), pp. 19-26.

Blumenthal, H. J. “Empedocles fr 17.19-20” Gräzer Beiträge 3 (1975), pp. 21-29..

Bodrero, E. Il Principio fondamentale del sistema di Empedocle. Rome: Loescher, 1904.

Bollack, J. “Die Metaphysik des Empedocles” Philologus 101 (1957), pp. 30-54.

Bollack, J. “Empédocle ou l’ancienne physique” L’Information Littéraire 17 (1965), pp. 203-207.

Bollack, J. Empédocle. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit 1965-1969.

Bollack, J. “Le Proéme du peri phuseos d’Empédocle” Revue des Études Grecques 72 (1959), pp. 15-16.

Bollack, J. “Les Zones de la cosmogonie d’Empédocle” Hermes 96 (1968), pp. 239-240.

Bollack, J. “Lukrez und Empedokles” Die Neue Rundschau 70 (1959), pp. 656-686.

Bollack, J. “Lukrez 1, 1114-17 und Empedokles Fr 110” Philologus 104 (1960), pp. 295-298.

Bollack, Mayotte. “La Chaîne aimantine, Lucrèce et ses modèles grecs” Revue des Études latines 41 (1963), pp. 165-185.

Booth, N. “Empedocles Account of Breathing” Journal of Hellenic Studies 80 (1960), pp. 10-15.

Booth, N. “Aristotle on Empedocles B100” Hermes 103 (1975), pp. 373-375.

Booth, N. “A Mistake to Be Avoided in the Interpretation of Empedocles” Journal of Hellenic Studies 96 (1976), pp147-148.

Boussoulas, N. “Essai sur la structure du mélange dans la pensée presocratiques: Empedocles” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 63 (1958), pp. 135-148.

Boussoulas, N. “La structure du mélange dans la pensée antique” Sophia 28 (1960), pp380-396.

Brink, C. O. “Horace and Empedocles’ Temperature: A Rejected Fragment of Empedocles” Phoenix 23 (1969), pp. 138-142.

Brown, G. “The Cosmological Theory of Empedocles” Apeiron 18 (1974), pp. 97-101.

Brown, R. D. “Lucretian Ridicule of Empedocles” Classical Quarterly 33 (1983), pp.146-160.

Brun, J. Empédocle ou la philosophe de l’amour et de la haine. Paris: Seghers, 1966.

Buhl, M. S. Untersuchungen zu Sprache und Stil des Empedokles. Unpublished dissertation. Heidelberg, 1956 (160p).

Burkert, W. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972.

Burkert, W. “Plotin, Plutarch, und die Platonisierende Interpretation von Heraklit und Empedokles” pp. 137-146 in Kephalaion ed. J. Mansfield and L. M. de Rijk. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1975.

Calogero, Guido. “L’eleatismo di Empedocle” Studii in onore di Luigi Castiglioni. Florence: G. C. Sansoni, 1960. Pp. 127-167.

Cataudella, Q. “Empedoclea” Revista de Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 38 (1960), pp. 124-132.

Charlton, W. Aristotle’s Physics I, II .Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.

Cooper, John. “Aristotle’s Natural Teleology” pp. 197-222 in Language and Logos, ed. M. Schofield and M. C. Nussbaum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

Cornford, F. M. Principium Sapientiae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952.

Crönert, W. “De Loborno Argivo” pp.123-145 in Charites (Festschrift F. Leo) Berlin: Weidmann, 1911.

Darcus, S. M. “Daimon Parallels the Holy Phren in Empedocles” Phroenesis 22 (1977), pp. 175-190.

Defradas, J. “Un Nouvel Empédocle?” Revue des Études Grecques 86 (1973), pp. 212-223.

De Ley, H. “Empedocles’ Sexual Theory: A Note on fragment B 63” L’Antiquité Classique 47 (1978), pp. 153-162.

Demand, N. “Pindar’s Olympian 2,Theon’s Faith, and Empedocles Katharmoi ” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 16 (1975), pp. 347-357.

Detienne, M. “La démonologie d’Empédocles” Revue des Études Grecques 72 (1959), pp. 1-17.

Diarmid, J. B. “Theophrastus on the Presocratic Causes” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 51 (1953), pp. 85-156.

Diels, H. Doxographi Graeci. Berlin: 1879 (repr. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1965).

Diels, H. “Gorgias und Empedokles” Sitzungsberichte der Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften 49 (1884), pp. 343-368.

Diels, H. “Stobias und Aëtios” Rheinisches Museum 36 (1881), pp. 343-350.

Diels, H. “Studia Empedoclea” Hermes 15 (1880), pp. 161-179.

Diels, H. “Über ein Fragment des Empedokles” Sitzungsberichte der Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften 62 (1897), pp. 1062-1073.

Diels, H. “Über die Gedichte des Empedokles” Sitzungsberichte der Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften 63 (1898), pp. 396-415.

Diels, H. “Symbola Empedoclea” pp. 125-130 in Mélanges H. Weil Paris: A. Fontemoing, 1898.

Diels, H. and Kranz, W. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker 6th ed. Berlin: Weidmann, 1951.

Drossart Lulofs, H. J. “Aristotle’s T cefe” Journal of Hellenic Studies 77 pt. 1 (1957), pp.75-80.

Dyer, R. “Empedocles fr. 64(= Plut. NQ 21 917é)” Mnemosyne 27 (1974), pp. 175-176.

Étienne, H. Poesis philosophica, uel saltem reliquiae poesis philosophicae, Empedoclis, Parmenidis,Xenophanis…, item Heracliti et Democriti loci quidam…Paris, 1573.’

Flashar, H. “Empedokles Frgm. B111 und seine Stellung im Lehrgedicht” pp. 547-551 in Actes de la XIIe conference internationale d’études classiques 1975.

Förster, A. “Empedocleum” Hermes 74 (1939), pp. 102-104.

Fränkl, H. “Homerische Wörter” Antidoron, Festschrift Wackernagel. Göttingen, 1923. Pp. 274-282.

Frenkian, A. “Theophrast De Sensu Kap 10″ Philologus 107 (1963), p. 313.

Furley, D. Empedocles and the Clepsydra” Journal of Hellenic Studies 77(1957), pp. 31-34.

Furley, D. Variations on a Theme by Empedocles in Lucretus’ Poem” BICS 17 (1970), pp. 55-64.

Furley, D. “Notes on Parmenides” pp. 1-15 in Exegesis and Argument ed. E. Lee, A. Mourelatos, and R. Rorty. New York: 1973 (=Phroenesis Supp. Vol. I).

Furley, D. J. and R. E. Allen, eds. Studies in Presocratic Philosophy. Vol 1: The Beginnings of Philosophy. London, 1970.

Furley, D. J. and R. E. Allen, eds. Studies in Presocratic Philosophy. Vol. 2.Eleatics and Pluralists. London, 1975.

Furley, D. J. and R. E. Allen, eds. Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature. Cambridge, 1989.

Furth, M. “Elements of Eleatic Ontology” Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 (1968), pp. 111-132; repr. In A. Mourelatos, ed. The Pre-Socratics pp. 241-270.

Gallavotti, C. “Alcune frasi di Empedocle interpretate con i criteri di Aristotele” Rendiconti della Classe di Scienze Morali storiche e filologiche dell’ Accademia dei Lincei 28 (1973), pp. 773-792.

Gallivotti, C. “Il proemio di Empedocle” Helikon XIII-XIV (1973-1974), pp. 7-34.

Gallivotti, C. “Il punto geometrico e l’Uno di Empedocle nel trattato peripatetico della linea indivisible” Rendiconti della Classe di Scienze Morali storiche e filologiche dell’Accademia dei Lincei 29 (1974), pp. 381-394.

Gallivotti, C. Empedocle: Poema fisico e lustrale. Mondadori, 1975.

Gallivotti, C. “Empedocle nei papyri ercolanesi” pp. 153-161 in Le monde grec ed. J. Bingen, G. Cambier, and G. Nachtergal. Brussels: Ed. de l’Université libre de Bruxelles, 1975.

Gallivotti, C. ” La critica di Empedocle in Diogene di Enoande” Museum Criticum X-XII (1975-1977), pp. 243-249.

Gallivotti, C. “Da Stesicoro ad Empedocle” Kokalos 26-27 (1980-1981), pp. 413-433.

Gallop, D. Plato:Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.

Gallop, D. Parmenides of Elea: Fragments. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1984.

Gerke, H. Sprache und Stil des Empedokles. Unpublished dissertation. Göttingen, 1953 (115 p).

Gladisch, A. Empedokles und die Aegypter. Leipzig, 1858.

Gomperz, T. “Zu Empedokles” Hermes 31 (1896), pp. 469-474.

Graham, D. W. “Symmetry in the Empedoclean Cycle” Classical Quarterly 38 (1988), pp. 297-312.

Grotius, Hugo. Dicta poetarum quae apud Io. Stobaeum exstant, emendata et latino carmine reddita ab H. G., (accesserunt…). Paris, 1623.

Guthrie, W. K. C. A History of Greek Philosophy vols. 1-2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962, 1965.

Hegel, G. W. F. Vorlesungungen üdie Geschichte der Philosophie. First published as vols. 13-15 (1833-36) of Hegel’s Werke, ed. by Karl Ludwig Michelet et alii, published by Duneker und Humboldt, Berlin, 1832-45.

Hershbell, J. P. “Empedocles’ Oral Style” Classical Journal 63 (1968), pp. 352-357.

Hershbell, J. P. “Hesiod and Empedocles” Classical Journal 65 (1970), pp. 145-161.

Hershbell, J. P. “Plutarch as Source for Empedocles Reexamined” American Journal of Philology 92 (1971), pp. 156-184.

Hershbell, J. P. “Hippolytus’ Elenchus as Source for Empedocles Reexamined” Phronesis 18 (1973), pp. 97-114,187-203.

Hershbell, J. P. “Empedoclean Influences on the Timaeus” Phoenix 28 (1974), pp. 145-166.

Hershbell, J. P. “The Idea of Strife in Early Greek Thought” The Personalist 53 (1974), pp. 205-215.

Hölscher, U. “Welzeiten und Lebenzyklus: Eine Nachprüfing der Empedokles-Doxographie” Hermes 93 (1965), pp. 7-33.

Hunger, H. “Palimpsest Fragmentum aus Herodians Katholike Prosoidia” Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantischen Gesellscchaft 16 (1967), pp. 1-33.

Huxley, G. “Aristotle’s Interest in Biography” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 15 (1974), pp. 203-213.

Inwood, B. The Poem of Empedocles: A Text with an Introduction. Toronto/Buffalo/London, 1992.

Janko, R. “Hesychius (216 and Empedocles Fragment 21.6” Classical Philology 81 (1986), pp. 308-309.

Jobst, Fr. “Über das Verhältnis zwischen Lucretius und Empedokles” Dissertation. Munich: Erlangen, 1907.

Jouanna, J. “Présence d’Empédocle dans la Collection Hippocratique” Bulletin d’Association G. Budé 20 (1961), pp. 452-463.

Kafka, G. “Zu Theophrasts de sensu” Philologus 72 (1913), pp. 65-82.

Kafka,G. “Zur Physikk des Empedokles” Philologus 78 (1923), pp. 202-230.

Kahn, C. Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmogony. New York: Columbia University Press, 1960; 2nd ed., Philadelphia, Centrum, 1985.

Kahn, C. “Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrines of the Soul”

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42 (1960), pp. 3-35; repr. In A. Mourelatos, ed. The Pre-Socratics, pp. 426-456.

Kahn, C. Review of J. Bollack Empédocle vol. 1 in Gnomon 41 (1969), pp. 439-447.

Kahn, C. H. “Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrine of the Soul” in A. Mourelatos, ed., The Pre-Socratics. A collection of Critical Essays, 2nd edition with editor’s addenda Princeton, 1993; 1st edition New York, 1974.

Karsten, S. Empedoclis Agrigentini Carminum Reliquiae. Amsterdam: J. Mueller, 1838.

Kingsley, P. Ancient Philosophy, Mystery and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford/New York, 1995.

Kingsley P. “Empedocles and His Interpreters: the Four Element Doxography” Phronesis 39 (1994), pp. 235-254.

Kingsley, P. “Empedocles’ Sun” Classical Quarterly 44 (1994), pp. 316-324.

Kingsley, P. “On the Teaching of Empedocles” Unpublished Cambridge M. Litt. Dissertation, 1979.

Kirk, G. S. Heraclitus: The Cosmic Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954.

Kirk, G. S., J. E. Raven, and M. Schofield. The Presocratic Philosophers 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Kirwan, C. Aristotle’s Metaphysics Books , 0, . Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.

Knatz, F. “Zu Empedoclea” in Schedae philologae H. Usener a sodalibus…oblatae. Bonn, 1891. Pp. 1-9.

Kranz, W. Empedocles, Antike, Gestalt und Romantische Neuschöpfung. Zurich: 1949.

Kranz, W. “Empedokles und die Atomistik” Hermes 47 (1912), pp. 18-42.

Kranz, W. “Lukrez und Empedokles” Philoologus 96 (1943), pp. 68-107.

Kranz, W. “Vorsokratisches 3. Die Katharmoi und die Physika des Empedokles” Hermes 70 (1935), pp. 111-119.

La Croce, E. “Empedocles’ Sphairos and Parmenidean Legacy” Platon 32-33 (1980-1981), pp. 114-122.

Lasserre, F. “Trois nouvelles citations poétiques” Museum Helveticum 26 (1969), pp. 80-83.

Last, H. “Empedokles and His Klepsydra Again” Classical Quarterly 18 (1924), pp. 169-173.

Lazzeri, M. “Un verso di Empedocle Fr. 10 Diels” Bolletino dei Classici 3a, ser. 1 (1980), pp. 25-28.

Lesher, J. H. “Parmenides Critique of Thinking: the pouludêris elenchon of fragment 7” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2 (1984), pp. 1-30.

Lloyd, A. H. “The Coin Types of Selinus and the Legend of Empedocles” The Numismatic Chronicle 15 (1935), pp. 73-93.

Lloyd-Jones, H. “Pindar and the After-Life” pp. 245-283 in Pindare: Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique vol. 31. Genève: Fondation Hardt, 1985.

Loenen, J. H. M. M. Parmenides, Melissus, Gorgias. Assen, 1951.

Lommatzsch, B. H. C. Die Weisheit des Empedocles nach ihren Quellen…philosophisch bearbeit…, Berlin, 1830.

Long, A. A. “The Principles of Parmenides Cosmogony” Phronesis 8 (1963), pp. 90-107; repr. in R. E. Allen and D. Furley, eds., Studies in Presocratic Philosophy vol. 2, cp. 3. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.

Long, A. A. “Thinking and Sense-Perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism” Classical Quarterly 16 (1966), pp. 256-276.

Long, A.A. “Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle in the Sixties” pp. 397-425 in A. Mourelatos, ed., The Pre-Socratics. A collection of Critical Essays, 2nd edition with editor’s addenda Princeton, 1993; 1st edition New York, 1974.

Long, H. S. “The Unity of Empedocles’ Thought” American Journal of Philology 70 (1949), pp. 142-158.

Longrigg, J. “Galen on Empedocles (fr. 67)” Philologus 108(1964), pp. 297-300.

Longrigg, J. “Empedocles’ Fiery Fish” Journal of the Warburg Institute 28 (1965), pp. 314-315.

Longrigg, J. “Teff 0ef” Classical Quarterly 15 (1965), pp. pp.249-251.

Longrigg, J. “Roots” Classical Review 17 (1967), pp. 1-4.

Longrigg, J. “Empedocles’ Fertile Fish” Journal of Hellenic Studies 4 (1974), p. 173.

Longrigg, J. “The ‘Roots of All Things’” Isis 67 (1976), pp. 420-438.

Lüth, J. C. Die Struktur des Wirklichen im empedokleischen System Meisenheim am Glam: Anton Hain, 1970.

Mansfield, J. “Ambiguity in Empedocles B17.3-5: A Suggestion” Phronesis 17 (1972), pp. 17-39.

Mansfield, J. “Critical Note: Empedocles and His Interpreters” Phronesis 39 (1994), pp. 109-115.

Marsoner, A. “Sul fr. 128 di Empedocles” Annali dell Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia della Università di Napoli 15 (1972-1973), pp. 5-10.

Martin, A. and O. Primavesi. L’Empédocle de Strasbourg. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1999.

Martin, H. “Plutarch’s Citation of Empedocles at Amatorius 756d” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 10 (1969), pp. 57-70.

McGibbon, D. “Metempsychosis in Pindar” Phronesis 9 (1964), pp. 5-12.

Millerd, C. E. On the Interpretation of Empedocles. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1908.

Minar, E. L. “Cosmic Periods in the Philosophy of Empedocles” Phronesis 8 (1963), pp. 127-145.

Minz, H. Anfänge des Naturrechts bei Empedokles, und ein Vergleich mit dem Naturrecht des Sophisten Antiphons. Dissertation of the University of Köln. Druck: G. Menden, Bonn, 1960.

Mourelatos, A. P. D. “Quality, Structure, and Emergence in Later Presocratic Philosophy” pp. 127- 194 in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy vol. 2, ed. J. Cleary, Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1987.

Mourelatos, A. P. D. ed. The Pre Socratics. Garden City, N. Y.: Anchor/Doubleday, 1974.

Mühl, M. “Über die Missgeschöpfe bei Empedokles” Rheinisches Museum 114 (1971), pp. 289-296.

Müller, C. W. Gleiches zu Gleiche ein Prinzip freuhgriechischen Denkens. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz, 1965.

Mugler, C. “Sur quelques fragments d’Empédocle” Revue de Philologie 25 (1951), pp. 33-65.

Mugler, C. Le vide des atomists et les pores d’Empédocle” Revue de Philologie 41(1967), pp. 217-224.

Mullach, F. W. A. Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum(rec., uertit, adnot,…). Vol I Paris, 1860; Empedocle, pp. xiii-xvii and 1-80.

Munding, H. “Zur Beweisführing des Empedokles” Hermes 82 (1954), pp.129-145.

Nélod, G. Empédocle d’Agrigente. Brussels, 1959; see also Gnomon 38 (1966), pp. 725-727.

Nestle, W. Der Dualismus des Empedokles” Philologus 65 (1906), pp. 545-557.

Nussbaum, M. C. “Aruistotle on Teleological Explanation” pp. 59-106 in Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.

Nussbaum, M. C. Comment on Mourelatos, pp. 195-207 in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy vol. 2, ed. J. Cleary. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1987.

O’Brien, D. “Empedocles fr. 35.14-15.” Classical Review 15 (1965), pp. 1-4.

O’Brien, D. “Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle” Classical Quarterly 17 (1967), pp. 29-40.

O’Brien, D. “Empedocles Theories of Seeing and Breathing” Journal of Hellenic Studies 90 (1970), pp. 140-179.

O’Brien, D. Empedocles Cosmic Cycle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

O’Brien, D. “Hermann Diels on the Prescocratics: Empedocles’ Double Destruction of the Cosmos (Aetius ii 4.8)” Phronesis 45 (2000), pp. 1-18.

O’Brien, D. Pour interpreter Empédocle. Leiden: Brill, 1981 (=Philosophia Antiqua 38).

O’Brien, D. “The Effect of a Simile: Empedocles’ Theories of Seeing” Journal of Hellenic Studies 90 (1970), pp. 140-179.

O’Brien, D. “The Relation of Empedocles and Anaxagoras” Journal of Hellenic Studies 88 (1968), pp. 93-113.

Osborne, C. “Empedocles Recycled” Classical Quarterly 37 (1987), pp. 24-50.

Osborne, C. Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Prescocratics. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1987.

Owen, G. E. L. “Eleatic Questions” Classical Quarterly 10 (1960), pp. 84-102; repr. in Logic, Science, and Dialectic ed. M. Nussbaum, ch. 1. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1986.

Owen, G.E L “Plato and Parmenides on the Timeless Present” The Monist 50 (1966), pp. 317-340; repr. in Logic, Science, and Dialectic ed. M. Nussbaum, ch. 2. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1986.

Owens, J. “Aristotle on Empedocles Fr. 8” Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supp. vol. 2 (1976), pp. 87-100.

Owens, J.

Panzerbeiter, F. “Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung des Empedokles” Gymnasialprogram Meiningen (1844) 35p.

Pasquali, G. “Doxographica aus Basiliusscholien” Nachrichten von der könglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 1910, pp. 194-228.

Peyron, A. Empedoclis et Parmenedis Fragmenta ex Codice Taurinensis. Leipzig: Wiegel, 1810.

Pfligersdorffer, Georg. Studien zu Poseidonios in Sitzungsberichteder der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosofisch-historische Klasse, Band 232, Abhandlung 5, 1959, pp. 100-131.

Powell, J. U. “The Simile of the Clepsydra in Empedocles” Classical Quarterly 17 (1923), pp. 172-174.

Prier, R. A. “Empedocles 17.1-13” Platon 28 (1976), pp. 214-223.

Rathmann, W. Quaestiones Pythagoreae Empedocleae. Halle: E. Klinz, 1933.

Reiche, Harald Anton Thrap. Empedocles’ Mixture, Eudoxon Astronomy, and Aristotle’s connate pneuma. Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert, 1960.

Reinhardt, K. “Empedokles Orphiker und Physiker” Classical Philology 445 (1950), pp. 170-179..

Riedweg, C. “Orphisches bei Empedocles” Antike und Abendland 4x (1995), pp. 34-59.

Roesler, W. “Der Anfang der Katharmoi des Empedokles” Hermes 111 (1983), pp. 170-179.

Rostagni, A. “Il poema sacro di Empedocle” Revista di Filologia e di Instruzione Classica 1 (1923), pp. 7-39.

Rudberg, G. “Empedokles und Evolution” Eranos 50 (1952), pp. 23-30.

Schmalzriedt, E. Peri Phuseos: Zur Frühgeschicte der Buchtitel. Munich: Fink, 1970.

Schneidewin, F. W. “Neue Verse des Empedokles” Philologus 6 (1851), pp. 155-167.

Schwabl, H. “Empedokles fr. B110” Wiener Studien 69 (1956), pp. 49-56.

Schwabl, H. “Zur ‘Theogonie’ bei Parmenides und Empedokles” Wiener Studien 70 (1957), pp. 278-289.

Sedley, D. N. “Empedocles Theory of Vision and Theophrastus’ De Sensibus” in Fortenbaugh, W.W. and D. Gutas, eds. Theophrastus. His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings. New Brunswick/London, 1992. Pp. 20-31.

Sedley, D. N. “The Proems of Empedocles and Lucretius” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 30 (1989), pp. 269-296.

Seeck, G. A. “Empedokles B 17.9-13, B 8, B100 bei Aristoteles” Hermes 95 (1967), pp. 28-53.

Sider, D. “Empedokles ‘Persika’” Ancient Philosophy 2 (1982), pp. 76-78.

Sider, D. “Empedocles B 96 (462 Bollack) and the Poetry of Adhesion” Mnemosyne 37 (1984), pp. 14-24.

Snell, B. “Hera als Erdgöttin” Philologus 96 (1943), pp. 159-160.

Solmsen, F. “Love and Strife in Empedocles’ Cosmogony” Phronesis 10 (1965), pp. 109-148.

Solmsen, F. “nώρÊς in Empedocles” Classical Review 17 (1967), pp. 245-246.

Solmsen, F. “Eternal and Temporary Beings in Empedocles’ Physical Poem” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 57 (1975), pp. 123-145.

Solmsen, F. “Empedocles’ Hymn to Apollo” Phronesis 25 (1980), pp. 219-227.

Sorabji, R. Necessity, Cause, and Blame. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980.

Sorabji, R. Matter, Space, and Motion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.

Steiger, K.. the Cosmology of Parmenides and Empedocles” Homonoia 2(1980), pp. 159-165.

Stein, H. Empedocles Agrigentinus Fragmenta Bonn: A. Marcus, 1852.

Stern, S. M. Article on Empedocles in The Encyclopedia of Islam, new edition, s. v. Anbadu”lis, 1960 vol I, pp. 483-484.

Sturz, F. G. Empedocles Agrigentinus…Leipzig: Göschen, 1805.

Taillardat. ” Le sens d’ ‘amorgos’ (Empedocle fr. 84 Diels 7) et les lanternes dans l’antiquité” Revue des Études Grecques 72(1959), pp. xi-xii.

Ten Brinlk, B. “Empedoclea” (letter to Schneidewin) Philologus 6 (1851), pp.730-734.

Thiele, G. “Zu den vier Elemente des Empedokles” Hermes 32 (1897), pp. 68-78.

Thomas, F. Sprachliche Untersuchungen zu Empedokles. Dissertation. Leipzig, 1924.

Tigner, S. S. “Empedocles’ Twirled Ladle and the Vortex-supported Earth” Isis 65 (1974), pp. 433-447.

Timpanaro-Cardini, M. “La clessidra di Empedocle e l’esperienza di Torricelli” Convegno di Studi Torricelliani. Faenza, 1958, Pp. 151-156.

Timpanaro-Cardini, M. La zoogonia di Empedoclee la critica aristotelica” Physis 2 (1960), pp. 5-13.

Timpanaro-Cardini, M. “Respirazione e clessidra” Parola del passato 12 (1957), pp. 250-270.

Timpanaro-Cardinin, M. ed. and tr. Pseudo-Aristotle De Lineis Insecabilibus. Varese: Istituto editoriale cisalpino, 1970.

Traglia, A. Studi sulla lingus di Empedocle. Bari: Adriatica, 1952.

Tucker, G. M. “Empedocles in Exile” Classical Review 45 (1931), pp. 49-51.

Van der Ben, N. The Proem of Empedocles’ Peri Physios. Amsterdam: Gruener, 1975.

Van der Ben, N. “Empedocles’ Fragments 8, 9, 10 DK” Phronesis 23 (1978), pp. 197-215.

Van Groningen, B. A. “Le fragment 111 d’Empédoclé” Classica et Mediaevalia 17 (1956), pp. 47-61.

Van Groningen, B. A. “Trois notes sur Empédocle” Mnemosyne 9 (1956), pp. 221-224.

Van Groningen, B. A. “Empédocle poète” Mnemosyne 24 (1971), pp. 169-188.

Verdenius, W. J. “Empedocles’ Doctrine of Sight” pp. 155-164 in Studia Vollgraff oblata. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1948.

Verdenius, W. J. “Notes on the Presocratics, VIII, The Meaning of 1ίστoς in Empedocles; IX, Empedocles Frag. 26,2” Mneomsyne s. IV, vol I (1948), pp. 10-14.

Von Arnim, H. “Weltperioden bei Empedokles” pp. 16-27 in Festschrift Gomperz. Vienna: A. Hoelder, 1902.

Von Fritz, K. “rστρoς rrDτrρωPo in Pindar’s Second Olympian and Pythagoras’ Theory of Metempsychosis” Phronesis 2 (1957) pp. 85-94.

Wenksus, O. “Empedokles Erklärung des Entstehung der Sonnenfinsternisse. Das Fragment DK 31B42” Hermes 108 (1980), pp. 243-248.

West, M. L. “Empedocles on Papyrus” Classical Review 12 (1962), p. 120.

West, M. L. “Notes on Newly Discovered Fragments of Greek Authors” Maia 20 (1968), pp. 199-200.

West, M. L. “nωρός in Empedocles” Classical Review 16 (1966), pp. 135-136.

Wicken, J. S. “Chance Necessity, and Purpose: Toward a Philosophy of Evolution” Zygon 16 (1981), pp. 97-101.

Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, U. von “Die Katharmoi des Empedokles” Sitzungsberichte der Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften 94(1929), pp.626-661; repr. in Kleine Schhriften. Pp. 473-521 (Berlin: Weidmann, 1935).

Wilamowitz-Mollendorf, U. von “Lesefrüchte” Hermes 65 (1930), pp. 245-250.

Wilkens, K. “Wie hat Empedokles die Vorgänge in der Klepsydra erklärt?” Hermes 95 ((1967), pp. 129-140.

Wisniewski, B. “Quaestiones Empedocleae” Parola del Passato 29 (1974), pp. 158-171.

Woodbury, L. “Equinox at Acragas” TAPA 97 (1966), pp. 597-616.

Worthen, T. “Pneumatic Action in the Klepsydra and Empedocles’ Account” Isis 61 (1970), pp. 520-530.

Wright, M. R. Empedocles: The Extant Fragments. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1981.

Zafiropoulo, J. Empédocle d’Agrigente. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1953.

Zuntz, G. “De Empedoclis librorum numero coniectura” Mnemosyne 18 (1965), p. 365.

Zuntz, G. “Empedokles fr. 137” Wiener Studien 79 (1966), pp. 38-44.

Zuntz, G. Persephone: Three Essays on Religion and Thought in Magna Graecia. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.